MultiversX Tracker is Live!

4 Experts Predict "MiCA Won't Drown Competition Out - It Will Drive Innovation Further"

Finance Magnates

Cryptocoins News / Finance Magnates 10 Views

The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation is transforming the continent's digital asset landscape, with early impacts already visible in market shifts and competitive dynamics among the industry.

Are companies ready for the new regulations? We asked industry representatives and compliance experts, and the findings are rather grim. While major players will likely adapt, most smaller firms are still unprepared to operate under the new rules.

MiCA: "The Next Phase of Crypto's Mainstream Adoption"

MiCA represents the EU's comprehensive attempt to bring regulatory clarity to the previously fragmented crypto landscape. The framework introduces stringent requirements for crypto-asset service providers, issuers, and exchanges operating within the bloc. While compliance deadlines are staggered throughout 2025, the market is already responding to the new reality, with compliant players positioning themselves to capitalize on the regulatory certainty.

"This is undoubtedly a sizable regulatory shift, and I completely recognize that many feel underprepared," noted Fiorenzo Manganiello of LIAN Group. "That said, a robust framework that encourages institutional investors to place their faith in these assets is exactly what we need right now, and European players will reap the rewards in the long-term. This is the next phase of crypto's mainstream adoption—soon, the markets will reap the benefits."

"A Tendency for Mergers and Acquisitions" — Market Consolidation Looms

Industry experts widely agree that MiCA compliance requirements will likely trigger significant market consolidation, particularly affecting smaller players in Eastern European countries where preparedness remains low.

Przemysław Kral, CEO of zondacrypto, offered a stark assessment of the situation: "For small players, MiCA compliance requirements might mean increased market consolidation. We can expect a tendency for mergers and acquisitions. Other smaller crypto businesses, particularly those with limited resources, might be forced to quit the EU market as a result of high costs of compliance."

Kral further noted that some businesses might transition to more flexible jurisdictions, potentially driving "migration of some businesses to outside EU countries with less strict regulations or even without regulations."

Quinn Perrott, co-CEO of TRAction, highlighted specific regional challenges: "EU firms facing gaps in their infrastructure in relation to MiCA compliance, particularly regions like Poland, Czechia and Baltic nations who are currently in fairly relaxed regulatory environments, will need to put in significant effort towards alignment and compliance with MiCA."

You may also like: “The Knee on Crypto's Neck is Lifting”: Hidden Road's Higgins on MiCA, Industry's Future

Stablecoin Market Shifts: "The Direction of Capital Flow"

The regulatory framework, which took full effect in January 2025, has created a clear divide between compliant and non-compliant entities, particularly in the stablecoin market where Circle has gained ground as Tether faces challenges.

The regulation's liquid reserve requirements—30% for asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) and 60% for significant ARTs—have already triggered notable market movements.

"Tether lost 1.3 billion USD of its market capitalization which might be a sign of outflow of investors in the face of new regulations. Circle gained 400 million dollars. It shows the direction of the capital flow into projects perceived as more compliant with the new regulations," Kral explained.

Kaiko Head of Research Anastasia Melachrinos provided additional context on these shifts: "MiCA-compliant stablecoins, such as Circle's EURC and Société Générale's EURCV, have seen their market share surge to an all-time high of 67%, primarily due to major exchanges delisting non-compliant stablecoins like Tether's EURT."

Perrott noted that Circle's compliance has been a key factor in its growth: "Circle is the first stablecoin issuer to have complied with MiCA and having received an electronic money institution status means it is allowed to issue its stablecoins USDC and EURC in the EU."

"MiCA regulations are already leaving their mark on digital asset issuers across the EU, as some of the most successful crypto players get to grips with the new guardrails," added Manganiello. "Just one example is the stablecoin market upheaval we're seeing as Circle takes a stab at Tether's market share."

"MiCA Won't Drown Competition Out—It'll Drive Innovation Further"

Despite the short-term disruption, many industry leaders remain optimistic about MiCA's long-term impact on the European crypto sector.

"Once issuers and exchanges get used to the new normal, I'd argue the stability and credibility these rules bring will encourage more players to enter the market. In the long-term, MiCA won't drown competition out—it'll drive innovation further," Manganiello said.

Kral echoed this sentiment: "MiCA aims at creating a more stable and secure environment for consumers and businesses. In the long-term, it is going to lead to a more sustainable crypto market.

However, Melachrinos offered a more measured assessment of current market dynamics: "Despite these changes, overall weekly trading volumes for EUR-backed stablecoins have remained steady at around $30 million since MiCA's implementation, indicating that the market share shifts are mainly due to compliance-driven delistings rather than increased demand."

As the industry continues to adapt to the new regulatory framework, the competitive landscape will likely continue to evolve. Well-capitalized and compliant players will be positioned to gain market share while smaller entities face difficult choices about their future in the European market.

Analysis: Convergence and Divergence

The experts converge on key points: MiCA will consolidate the market, favor compliant and well-capitalized firms, and ultimately enhance stability. However, their tones differ. Manganiello and Kral are proactive, viewing MiCA as a catalyst for innovation and growth. Perrott is more cautious, emphasizing the logistical hurdles, especially for Eastern Europe. Melachrinos, grounded in data, offers a neutral lens, highlighting shifts without overpredicting outcomes.

The stablecoin narrative exemplifies this dynamic: all note Circle’s gains and Tether’s losses, but Manganiello sees it as healthy competition, Perrott as a compliance triumph, Kral as a capital flow signal, and Melachrinos as a market share realignment. This suggests MiCA’s impact is multifaceted, hinging on firms’ readiness and resources.

This article was written by Damian Chmiel at www.financemagnates.com.
Get BONUS $200 for FREE!

You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
💰 Install these recommended apps:
💲 SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
💲 xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
💲 CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
💰 Register on these recommended exchanges:
🟡 Binance🟡 Bitfinex🟡 Bitmart🟡 Bittrex🟡 Bitget
🟡 CoinEx🟡 Crypto.com🟡 Gate.io🟡 Huobi🟡 Kucoin.



Comments