As a Bitcoin holder, Eth makes complete sense to me.

I don’t understand why I continue to see Bitcoin holders try and bash Eth, saying it’s a shitcoin/alt coin and will never replace Bitcoin (as if replacing Bitcoin is even possible at this point. It isn’t).

I also don’t understand why I see Eth investors bash Bitcoin and state that one day Eth could replace Bitcoin. It can’t, and it’s never tried to nor is it designed to.

Bitcoin = reserve asset, store of value.

Eth = Web 3.0, future infrastructure of the digital world.

They will both exist, and both are profound inventions that couldn’t be more different. Their differences are precisely why they both have tremendous value.

Why the comparisons, then? Is it just fundamental lack of understanding by those comparing of what they’re talking about?

For transparency I’m 95/5 BTC/Eth in personal holdings.