I get that the rivalry between L1 communities could be justified to some extent (even though I think that competition and diversity is a great thing for us, the consumers) but I really don’t get the rivalry and tribalism between L2 communities. Aren’t we all working for the same exact goal? To improve Ethereum?
There’s no deny that certain L2s and scaling solutions are simply better than the other be it because of more funding, longer time in the market or a better development team over all.
I personally root a lot for Polygon considering that they have the most funding and liquidity out of all other scaling solutions (and thats apparent by their allocation of $1 billion toward ZK tech development) plus they also have more than 8 Ethereum scaling solutions each with its specific purpose. Finally they already secured a ton of partnerships with major global companies the likes of Instagram, Stripe and recently Bentley.
My love for this scaling solution does NOT disregard other L2s and scaling solutions. I know that they are JUST AS IMPORTANT as this one. I just happen to support Polygon more.
But the tribalism (especially within the Ethereum ecosystem) needs to end. I’m in full support of any development that happens with Loopring, Zksync, Starkware or any other Ethereum scaling solutions working hard and sinking funds into making Ethereum a better place for us as consumers and supporters of Ethereum.
[link] [comments]
You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
💰 Install these recommended apps:
💲 SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
💲 xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
💲 CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
💰 Register on these recommended exchanges:
🟡 Binance🟡 Bitfinex🟡 Bitmart🟡 Bittrex🟡 Bitget
🟡 CoinEx🟡 Crypto.com🟡 Gate.io🟡 Huobi🟡 Kucoin.
Comments