The Algorand shillers have been relentless about the future of the project lately. I do not believe it has a future. This is the opposite of an Algorand shill post.

The Algorand shillers have been relentless about the future of the project lately. I do not believe it has a future. This is the opposite of an Algorand shill post.

I do not hold ALGO. This is why. TLDR - just read the bold headlines.

​

Inflation - 27% increase

The Inflation of a coin is simply the rate at which it is currently increasing its supply every year. I.e. If a token has a 2% inflation rate, then one year from now, 2% more tokens are available to buy.

One year ago, Algorand had 5,460,295,593 coins in circulation. Today it has 6,927,212,643. This represents an increase of 27%. Factoring in the estimated staking rate of ~5%, it means the token loses more than 20% of its value every year.

(The coin has an inflation rate of 95% if I take the value from 54 weeks ago, going from 3.5bn tokens to 6.9bn in the past year.)

​

Daily Active Users - 97% drop

This is simply the number of addresses on the blockchain that perform at least one transaction on a particular day.

During the bear market, all projects lose users. Algorand has lost a lot of its daily active users, dropping from over 1,773,000 to just 60600. This represents a staggering 97% drop in active users. In the same time frame, Ethereum has dropped 14% (and that doesn't even include layer 2 protocols like Arbitrum).

This statistic is so bad, it is not even available on the explorer - they only list the total accounts. I had to get the real data from Messari.

Messari - Algorand Daily Active Addresses

​

MarketCap Rank - dropped 11 spots

This metric is market value size of the cryptocurrency relative to all other cryptocurrencies. One year ago, Algorand was ranked as the 18th largest crypto. Today it is 29th - a drop of 11 spots.

​

The CEO quit - he got bored

Obvious. But the CEO left the project to pursue other interests. Historically, any time a CEO leaves a project, it has rarely, if ever, held its value. See Loopring or Fantom...

​

Decentralisation - not too bad

The level of decentralisation for Algorand is unneccesarily convoluted. The easiest way to consider its level of decentralisation is two factors:

• The Nakamoto Coefficient is estimated to be between 13 and 15, which puts it well behind its competitors. Avalanche 30, Solana at 31, Polkadot 82
• The number of active validators is 370. Cardano at 3500, Ethereum 411,000

​

Scalability - copied another project's idea

Algorand 'solved' the scaling problem by copying what Bitcoin cash did - and somehow made it worse. They simply make bigger blocks, but they sacrificed efficiency. Bitcoin Cash creates 32MB blocks every 10 minutes - Algorand requires ~ 800 MB to accomplish the same task. Basically, it requires 25x more data to process transactions than a five year old crypto.

​

Finally, the shill posts...

Some users may be aware, but it is long believe that some projects employ paid shillers. Literally people that post information in a positive light consistently. It is my belief that Algorand is guilty of this. Please understand, that this is purely speculation and I have no evidence. I would be happy to point out specific users and link posts that I am adamant are paid advertising by Algorand. But out of respect to the subs rules, I will abstain - but if a Mod approves it, I have it ready to go.

​

EDIT:

Lots of people accusing me of not having the balls to respond to the comments.

I actually responded to several of them, but most of my comments got downvoted into oblivion, so I just gave up. If you want to debate, that’s cool, but apparently you only get toddler tantrums from ALGO shillers.

I tried responding to this comment, but my response got destroyed by the paid shillers, so I’ll put it here..

• If you want to take the snapshot of the market cap position on the date in your comment, go ahead, but then you also have to take the token supply on that date too, so enjoy the 95% inflation rate that goes with it. *

If reading comments, I suggest sorting by controversial.