Don't fight BTC - Find new opportunity!

BTC is going to do its thing. Any flaw is simply a future issue that will be solved.

How can anyone argue with that? You can't and you shouldn't.

As it stands, strength in BTC opens the doors to all the other uses of blockchain. So why fight it?
But hold tight- you can love your altcoin too!
We've hardly scratched the surface on using blockchain in the innovative ways many projects will pitch.
I say if you've followed a project, and it truly makes sense to you, go for it.
Or if it just sort of makes sense, and you are willing to take on the risk/reward, why not? Not financial advice of course.
But realize like all things in life, once you get sucked into a narrative, you can defend it just about every which way.

So, don't try to talk me out of this- I know I'm 100% right. And I've only been wrong twice when I was 100% right.

Here is the massive opportunity in onboarding endless business use cases:

The major barriers to tapping into business are cost, complexity, and available resources.

An logical first step is to provide a low cost PRIVATENET so business can engage and quickly start to prove out internal value. The people writing checks can then justify larger public use cases.

Why are resources limited? Because CODING options are extremely limited. ADA got beat up for creating their own language, eth uses solidity which few know, others maybe have one or two, and some have added multiple languages using wasm, which is like trying to write a book using 50 words (or so I'm told).
Good luck convincing a business to train/hire someone to start coding with a language they don't know. That's how major flaws occur, which we see time and again in this space.
And even if they really consider taking the first step- they realize the battle will just continue when attempting to maintain and expand any use case if they are forever limited this way.

Therefore, building in the programming languages that are widely used creates a value proposition where business can justify investment! So, yes the altcoin I'm talking about has developed a way to code in ALL languages that run on linux kernel. Which opens the door to 1000x more devs than eth.

I will say eth has made it a requirement to be EVM compatible. They've created an ecosystem unlike the others, so you have to leverage that. No one wants to invest in use cases where people need to interact in ways they aren't used to (especially if they have an option). This is why you see other chains trying to "add" compatibility after realizing their initial product wasn't very useful.

This approach and vision is how I find myself hooked into the potential of Qanplatform. There's plenty more to mention, but you can research if you want.

Will they make it? I have no idea. I am fully aware of every last bit of FUD. The token was hacked, the github is closed, not on many exchanges, don't get the top wallet, etc. Btw, that is why you'll see the price went to nearly $0- trading was halted and on one was compensated at that level. They are only 2x more than funding rounds from over 2 years ago. The restore happened at a price of .012 and all the details are publicly available.

They've truly been through it all, and only look to be stronger because of it. There looks to be new funding coming in, which only reinforces my opinion.
If you followed GME, you know that finding a beat up survivor offers deep, deep value. Any and all fud is just opportunity in my eyes.

So, if you are looking for deep value, let's hear what you think. And just let BTC be BTC.