Seems like the major Eth devs believe this concern has already been addressed. Anyone know where it’s addressed, and for all the investors staking Eth on a third party, did you know you are at risk of getting slashed if the US didn’t want to play nice wit

There is a period between Merge and Unlock in which if the US attacks, the choice The Eth community would be left with is either slash 10 billion in small users staked funds on staking service that have to comply with sanctions(for example Coinbase, even if Brian wanted to do what’s best for Eth, and instead of censor, unstake the locked tokens and accept > 50 mil in inactivity slashes while in process, he can’t. He has shareholders. He can’t purposefully lose money for the good of Eth and he can’t give up major parts of his business so that eth doesn’t have to obey sanctions. Lol.) and unwind all of defi and replace US VC made front ends and get rid of US based stablecoins, or accept being captured.

The plan is to hope for the best and assume a benevolent USA while we are literally attacking their power to debase. Lol.

So the devs say this is not a worry. Where can I find something that tells me why this isn’t a concern?